AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SENECA NATION OF INDIANS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE, v. STATE OF NEW YORK; GEORGE E. PATAKI, AS GOVERNOR; JOSEPH SEYMOUR, AS COMMISSIONER OF THE OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES; AND BERNADETTE CASTRO, AS COMMISSIONER OF PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, FREDERICK W. TAPP, JANE E. SCHUCK, KENT SANDFORD, RICHARD J. McCUTCHEON, BEVERLY A. McCUTCHEON, ALBERT A. HOFFMAN, LUCY HOFFMAN, MYLES BARRACLOUGH, SANDRA BARRACLOUGH, DUANE G. GLOVER, PAUL H. GEER, VIRGINIA M. GEER, SCOTT E. FISHER, ROSEMARY N. FISHER, WILLIAM E. CAMPBELL, DAVID J. GIBSON, CLARENCE J. COFFMAN, JR., C. JAMES COFFMAN, SR., JEAN COFFMAN, EILEEN W. GARLING, ROBERT F. VAN DER HORST, SUSAN F. VAN DER HORST, JOSEPH CHIAPUSO, SUSAN CHIAPUSO, HOWARD B. WHITNEY ESTATE, DEBORAH BALDWIN, ROBERT L. JONES, EUGENIA JONES, STEPHEN M. KANE, CLARENCE J. COFFMAN, SR., HOWARD L. LUZIER, FLORENCE LUZIER, WALTER L. WHITNEY, EXECUTOR, LOUISE HICKEY, PHILLIP CONFER, SHIRLEY CONFER, DAVID C. WILLIAMS, AND FRANCES E. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS. SENECA NATION OF INDIANS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, TONAWANDA BAND OF SENECA INDIANS, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ON ITS OWN BEHALF, AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE SENECA NATION OF INDIANS AND THE TONAWANDA BAND OF SENECA INDIANS, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE,

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the orders of the district court denying the State of New York's Eleventh Amendment defenses for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Curtin in the decision below. See Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York, 26 F. Supp.2d 555, 563-65 (W.D.N.Y. 1998). In doing so, we note that the State of New York retains its Eleventh Amendment immunity to the extent that the Seneca Nation of Indians or the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians raise claims or issues that are not identical to those made by the United States. See Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605, 614 (1983) (holding that granting tribes leave to intervene in suit commenced by United States against states does not violate Eleventh Amendment because "[t]he Tribes do not seek to bring new claims or issues against the states").

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SENECA NATION OF INDIANS v. NEW YORK
(May 17, 1999)