Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reversing the defendant's conviction for aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was indicted on charges of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 Veh. Traf.[3]), driving while ability impaired (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 Veh. Traf.[1]), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 Veh. Traf.[3] [a]), and aggravated unlicensed operation of, a motor vehicle in the second degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 Veh. Traf.[2] [a] [iv]). The jury found the defendant not guilty of the first two charges.
Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 Veh. Traf.(3) (a), a person is guilty of the crime of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree when he or she commits the crime of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree as provided in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 Veh. Traf.(2) (a) (ii), (iii) or (iv) and is operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 Veh. Traf.(1), (2), (3), (4), or (5).
Here, in light of the defendant's acquittal on the charges under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 Veh. Traf.(1) and (3), an essential element for conviction of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree is missing and therefore the verdict is repugnant ( see, People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Santucci, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.