AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID A. ROETTGER, Plaintiff/Appellant v. METRO GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants/Appellees.

PER CURIAM

This case is before the Court upon motion for review pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(5)(B), the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference;

Whereupon, it appears to the Court that the motion for review is not well-taken and should be denied; and

It is, therefore, ordered that the Panel's findings of fact and conclusions of law are adopted and affirmed, and the decision of the Panel is made the judgment of the Court.

Costs on appeal are taxed to the plaintiff-appellant.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of May, 1999.

PER CURIAM

Birch, J. — Not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROETTGER v. METRO GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE
(May 27, 1999)