AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

FRANK DeMEO, appellant, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, et al., respondents.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs motion, although characterized as one for renewal and reargument of the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, was in actuality a motion for reargument since it was not based upon new facts which were unavailable at the time of the original motion, the denial of which is not appealable ( see, Wodecki v. Carty, 167 A.D.2d 398; Huttner v. McDaid, 151 A.D.2d 547; Mgrditchian v. Donato, 141 A.D.2d 513).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DeMEO v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
(Jun 1, 1999)