Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. JAMES D. LUEDTKE, PETITIONER, v. DANIEL BERTRAND, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

(Affirming 220 Wis.2d 574, 583 N.W.2d 858 (Ct.App. 1998)

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the published decision of the court of appeals, State ex rel. Luedtke v. Bertrand, 220 Wis.2d 574, 583 N.W.2d 858 (Ct.App. 1998). Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and David T. Prosser would affirm; Justices Donald W. Steinmetz, William A. Bablitch and N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Jon P. Wilcox withdrew from participation.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

By the Court. — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE EX REL. LUEDTKE v. BERTRAND
(May 28, 1999)