Plaintiffs in this defamation action produce a series of local beauty pageants, promoted nationwide, the winners of which participate in a well-publicized national pageant that has been considered for syndicated national television broadcast. We affirm on a finding that plaintiffs have not shown that defendants acted in a grossly irresponsible manner ( see, Gorman v. Random House, 237 A.D.2d 564, 565, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 90 N.Y.2d 921). Further, we note that some, if not all, of the statements pleaded in the complaint and emphasized on appeal were of a "loose, figurative or hyperbolic" sort and, as such, nonactionable as expressions of opinion ( see, Polish Am. Immigration Relief Comm. v. Relax, 189 A.D.2d 370, 373). We have not considered plaintiff's arguments as to any statement from the broadcast not pleaded with specificity in the amended complaint ( see, CPLR 3016 [a]). Were we to consider such arguments, we would find them unavailing.
Concur — Lerner, J.P., Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.