DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage it received through an assignment from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The only defendant to serve an answer was the defendant Financial Federal Co. (hereinafter Federal).
Federal asserted in its first affirmative defense that the complaint is insufficient because it lacks a complete and accurate description of the premises to be foreclosed upon. We disagree. Since the inaccuracy amounted only to typographical errors, the mortgage sufficiently described the property to be foreclosed upon ( see, Goff v. Shultis, 26 N.Y.2d 240; Riggs v. Kirschner, 187 A.D.2d 759; Town of Brookhaven v. Dinos, 76 A.D.2d 555, affd 54 N.Y.2d 911).
Federal's remaining contentions are without merit.