AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of DIANE SPEARS, et al., respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision in the first decretal paragraph thereof awarding the petitioner Diane Spears judgment in the principal sum $150,000, and substituting therefor a provision awarding the petitioner Diane Spears judgment in the principal sum of $10,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the petitioners.

The New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the Transit Authority) is a self-insurer which provides uninsured motorist coverage to its passengers in accordance with Insurance Law § 3420(f)(1). The Transit Authority contends, inter alia, that the Supreme Court erred in confirming an arbitration award to the petitioner Diane Spears which exceeded the $10,000 per person statutory limit of its uninsured motorist coverage that was in effect at the time of the accident. We agree.

It is well settled that an arbitration award may be vacated upon the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her authority by making an award in excess of the limits fixed by the insurance policy ( see, Matter of Brijmohan v. State Farm Ins. Co., 92 N.Y.2d 821; Matter of Sagona v. State Farm Ins. Co., 218 A.D.2d 660; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Silver, 225 A.D.2d 690). In this case, the Transit Authority was obligated by Insurance Law § 3420 (former [f][1]) to provide the petitioners with uninsured motorist insurance in the maximum sum of $10,000 per person and $20,000 per accident ( see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. [Thom], 70 A.D.2d 158). Accordingly, the arbitrator exceeded his authority by awarding the petitioner Diane Spears damages in the sum of $150,000, and we modify the judgment appealed from to reduce this award to $10,000. We further note that the Transit Authority did not waive this claim by failing to appear at the arbitration hearing, since "[a] limitation on the arbitrator's power 'will not be waived if the party relying on it asserts it * * * in opposition to an application for confirmation' " ( Matter of Brijmohan v. State Farm Ins. Co., supra, at 822, quoting Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 N.Y.2d 299, 309).

The Transit Authority's remaining contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SPEARS v. NEW YORK CITY TRAN. AUTH
(Jun 14, 1999)