Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence was properly denied. In the early morning hours, defendant was stopped with two others shortly after officers received a report of a knifepoint robbery. In close proximity to the occurrence, defendant and his companions, the only group of three persons on the street, were headed in the direction indicated in the report and matched the number, gender, ethnicity and height of the alleged perpetrators. At least two of the three men wore clothing matching the description broadcast. These circumstances provided reasonable suspicion warranting a detention for identification purposes and a frisk, which revealed a box cutter on defendant's person ( see, People v. Allen, 73 N.Y.2d 378, 380; People v. Brown, 254 A.D.2d 88, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 980). The showup identification was justified by its spatial and temporal proximity to the crime and was not unduly suggestive ( see, People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541, 544).
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.