DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, his initial stop and detention by the arresting officer was justified, based upon reasonable suspicion that the defendant had committed a recently reported robbery ( see, People v. Sharpe, 259 A.D.2d 639 [2d Dept., Mar. 15, 1999]; People v. Private, 259 A.D.2d 504 [2d Dept., Mar. 1, 1999]). Thereafter, when the victim identified the defendant as one of the robbers at a showup, which was close in time and place to the crime ( see, People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541; People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 1023; People v. Williams, 258 A.D.2d 543 [2d Dept., Feb. 8, 1999]; People v. Hernandez, 250 A.D.2d 704), the police had probable cause to arrest him ( see, People v. Martinez, 80 N.Y.2d 444; People v. Alio, 255 A.D.2d 448 [2d Dept., Nov. 16, 1998]; People v. Bryant, 246 A.D.2d 662). Accordingly, the court properly denied suppression of the physical evidence in question.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.