AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSE ESPINAL, appellant, v. TIMOTHY J. SUREAU, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment ( see, CPLR 3212). The defendant's vehicle crossed a double-yellow line in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1126 Veh. Traf.(a) and struck an oncoming vehicle driven by the plaintiff. The defendant's violation of that statute may be excused if he exercised reasonable care in an effort to comply ( see, Aranzullo v. Seidell, 96 A.D.2d 1048, 1049). The record in this case presents a question of fact for a jury as to whether the defendant's conduct was reasonable under the circumstances ( see, Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N.Y.2d 132). In addition, the defendant raised triable issues of fact with respect to whether the plaintiff was guilty of negligence which contributed in some degree to the happening of the accident.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ESPINAL v. SUREAU
(Jun 21, 1999)