DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the defendant's voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal all aspects of this case encompassed his right to review of the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to the police ( see, People v. Muniz, 91 N.Y.2d 570).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty, since the plea and sentencing minutes reveal that the court conducted a sufficient inquiry into, and properly rejected, his unsupported assertions of innocence, duress, and coercion ( see, People v. Toney, 215 A.D.2d 791; People v. Billings, 208 A.D.2d 941).
The defendant's contention, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, that he was denied meaningful representation by counsel, is without merit ( see, People v. Flores, 84 N.Y.2d 184, 186-187; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147).