AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ROSE MARIE McKITHEN, respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., appellants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated October 7, 1998, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reargument; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated July 29, 1998, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion to strike the defendants' answer based upon their failure to comply with the plaintiff's discovery demands ( see, CPLR 3126; DiDomenico v. C S Aeromatick Supplies, 252 A.D.2d 41; Ferraro v. Koncal Assoc., 97 A.D.2d 429).

The plaintiff's remaining contention does not require reversal.

BRACKEN, J.P., RITTER, ALTMAN, and FRIEDMANN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McKITHEN v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Jun 28, 1999)