Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT A. HOLMAN, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of forgery, in violation of Section 570.090 RSMo (1994), on which count he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to twenty years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HOLMAN
(Jun 29, 1999)