By failing to make specific objections, defendant has not preserved his current challenges to the prosecutor's summation and to the suitability of the court's curative instructions, adn we decline to review them in the interest of of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the curative instructions, which the jury is presumed to have followed (see, people v. davis, 58 N.Y.2d 1102), prevented any prejudice to defendant from the challenged remarks and that defendant was not deprived of a fair trial (see, people v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884).
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief.