DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs appealed the plaintiff Michael Livolsi's five-day suspension from high school to the New York State Commissioner of Education, who made a determination in the respondents' favor. The plaintiffs never sought judicial review of the Commissioner's determination pursuant to CPLR article 78, although they could have done so. Therefore, the plaintiffs are barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata from relitigating the propriety of the suspension ( see, e.g., Matter of Camperlengo v. Barell, 78 N.Y.2d 674; Ryan v. New York Tel. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 494, 497).
Moreover, the plaintiffs' cause of action sounding in "negligence" is clearly based upon alleged "educational malpractice". As a matter of public policy, such a cause of action cannot be entertained by the courts of this State ( see, Hoffman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 49 N.Y.2d 121, 125; Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School Dist., 47 N.Y.2d 440; Helbig v. City of New York, 212 A.D.2d 506).
Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed.