AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD R. DAVID, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In satisfaction of a six-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of sodomy in the first degree as a result of his molestation of a three-year-old child. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a definite term of 20 years in prison. Defendant now argues that this sentence was harsh and excessive because a more lenient sentence had been discussed in the context of an earlier plea of guilty to a superior court information which was subsequently withdrawn. We disagree. A sentence within permissible statutory ranges will not be disturbed unless extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a modification (see, People v. Dolphy, 257 A.D.2d 681, 685, 685 N.Y.S.2d 485, 489, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 872). Here, given defendant's prior criminal history and his admitted victimization of a helpless child for his own sexual gratification, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed in the interest of justice (see,id.).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DAVID
(Jul 8, 1999)