AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN V. WOODARD, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of conspiracy in the second degree as a result of his admitted agreement to participate in what was ultimately an unsuccessful "murder for hire" scheme. As part of the plea negotiations, the only commitment County Court made was to set as a ceiling a sentence of 5 to 15 years in prison. The court ultimately sentenced defendant to an indeterminate term of 4 to 12 years in prison. Defendant now argues that this sentence was harsh and excessive because, inter alia, the People recommended a lesser sentence. Nevertheless, a sentence within permissible statutory ranges will not be disturbed unless extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a modification (see, People v. Dolphy, 257 A.D.2d 681, 685, 685 N.Y.S.2d 485, 489, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 872). Here, given defendant's record, the previous leniency shown to [him, and the circumstances of defendant's conduct in conspiring to take a life and his actions in furtherance of that plan while on probation for an unrelated crime as described in the record, we discern no reason to disturb the sentence imposed in the interest of justice (see, id.).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WOODARD
(Jul 15, 1999)