Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. MARK K. HOAK, Appellant

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 1999, the Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justice Cappy and Castille and Madame Justice Newman would affirm.

Mr. Chief Justice Flaherty and Messrs. Justice Zappala and Nigro would reverse.

Mr. Justice Saylor did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. v. HOAK
(Aug 19, 1999)