AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Michael Carroll, et al., appellants, v. Timko Contracting Corp., defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent; Dak Electric Contracting Corp., third-party defendant-respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

While the injured plaintiff was standing on level ground, hoisting a reel of wire up two steps onto a platform, a pipe slipped out of his hands and he fell. The instant accident does not come within the scope of hazards covered by Labor Law § 240 Lab.(1) ( see, Melber v. 6333 Main Str., 91 N.Y. 759; Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 514; Rodriguez v. Tietz Ctr. for Nursing Care, 84 N.Y.2d 841). The injured plaintiff was not working at an elevated worksite, nor was he struck by an object positioned at a higher level. The mere fact that he was lifting a heavy object did not give rise to liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 Labor (1) ( see, Narrow v. Crane-Hogan Structural Svs., 202 A.D.2d 841).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARROLL v. TIMKO CONTRACTING CORP
(Sep 13, 1999)