AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HELEN W. SAGARIN, Appellant, v. JOSEPH SAGARIN, Respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court did not improperly deny that branch of her motion which was for an award of counsel fees ( see, Zucker v. Zucker, 187 A.D.2d 507; Mulcahy v. Mulcahy, 170 A.D.2d 587).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are either without merit or have been rendered academic by a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 23, 1998, and the appeal therefrom ( see, Sagarin v. Sagarin, 264 A.D.2d 769 [decided herewith]).

RITTER, J.P., JOY, H. MILLER, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAGARIN v. SAGARIN
(Sep 20, 1999)