AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STEVEN GOULD, etc., respondent, v. DONALD ADAMS, etc., appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeals from the decisions are dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see, Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly determined that the liquidated damages provision of the agreement between him and the plaintiff constituted an unenforceable penalty ( see, Truck Rent-A-Center v. Puritan Farms 2d 41 N.Y.2d 420, 425; City of Rye v. Public Serv. Mitt. Ins. Co., 34 N.Y.2d 470, 473; Irving Tire Co. v. Stage II Apparel Corp., 230 A.D.2d 772, 773; Rallye Leasing v. L.I. Seafood Dumpling House, 213 A.D.2d 533). The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the proper measure for the damages suffered by the defendant was the difference between the contract price and the fair market value of the dental practice and the real property at the time of the breach, placing him in the same position as if the breach had never occurred ( see, Barnes v. Brown, 130 N.Y. 372, 381; Mohen v. Mooney, 205 A.D.2d 670; Kenford Co. v. County of Erie, 108 A.D.2d 132, 135, affd 67 N.Y.2d 257; Aroneck v. Atkin, 90 A.D.2d 966).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, GOLDSTEIN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOULD v. ADAMS
(Sep 20, 1999)