AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT v. KEVIN SHAWN ROTELLINI, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the trial court's judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of stealing a credit card and one count of stealing $150 or more in violation of section 570.030 RSMo 1994.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ROTELLINI
(Sep 21, 1999)