Defendant's motion to suppress his videotaped statement was properly denied. There was no evidence before the hearing court that the police intentionally delayed defendant's arraignment for the purpose of recording a videotaped statement before the indelible right to counsel attached. On the contrary, the delay between the arrest and the arraignment was reasonable for purposes of further investigation and defendant's right to counsel was not violated (see, People v. Roberson, 249 A.D.2d 148,lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 904). Moreover, there is no evidence of any delay in arraignment beyond that typically associated with arrest processing (See, People ex rel. Maxian v. Brown, 77 N.Y.2d 422).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.