Defendants' suppression motions were properly granted. The officers were justified in stopping defendants' vehicle for a traffic violation, but in the absence of any suspicious circumstances other than allegedly nervous behavior of a minimal and equivocal nature, the police did not have a founded suspicion that criminality was afoot sufficient to justify their clearly accusatory inquiry and their request for consent to search the vehicle's trunk where the weapon was recovered (see, People v. Barreras, 253 A.D.2d 369; see also, People v. Banks, 85 N.Y.2d 558,cert denied 516 U.S. 868). We note the request to search the trunk occurred after the officers completed their examination of the vehicle and found no contraband. Even were we to accept the People's argument that the police request to search the trunk was the result of defendants' invitation, we would find that this invitation followed the officers' unauthorized inquiry (see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 185) as to the presence of contraband in the car.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.