AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ARTHUR L. GLEISSNER, appellant, v. SANTOKH SINGH, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for an inquest on the issue of damages.

A motion to be relieved of a default in answering is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and the exercise of such discretion generally should not be disturbed if there is support in the record therefor ( see, Mondrone v. Lakeview Auto Sales Serv., 170 A.D.2d 586). Since the defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense to the action, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in compelling the plaintiff to accept the defendant's late answer ( see, Mondrone v. Lakeview Auto Sales Serv., supra).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GLEISSNER v. SINGH
(Sep 27, 1999)