Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE OF LOUISIANA vs. EDWARD FOBBS

Granted with order. See per curiam.

CDK

PFC

WFM

BJJ

JPV

JTK

LEMMON, J. not on panel.

TRAYLOR, J. dissents.

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Lemmon, J., not on panel. See La. S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.

Granted. This case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration on the merits of the trial court's determination that the mandatory minimum term without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence specified by La.R.S. 40:967 (B) (4) (b) for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute is excessive as applied to this particular offender. Our observation in State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276, 1280 (La. 1993), that "the review of sentencing, including sentencing under R.S. 15:529.1, is a long established function of the judicial branch," does not, nor did we intend it to, restrict the sentence review principles espoused in that decision solely to the mandatory minimum penalties provided by La.R.S. 15:529.1. See State v. Davis, 94-2332, pp. 11-12 (La.App. 1st Cir. 12/15/95), 666 So.2d 400, 407-08. As we explained in State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762, 766 (La. 1979), La. Const. Art. 1, § 20 provides "the basis for extending the court's control over the entire sentencing process." (emphasis added).

TRAYLOR, J. dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FOBBS, 99-1024 (La. 9/24/99)
(Sep 24, 1999)