AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS RILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Since nothing in defendant's plea allocution cast doubt on his guilt, the court had no obligation to conduct a sua sponte inquiry into allegedly exculpatory statements made by defendant at sentencing (see, People v. Negron, 222 A.D.2d 327, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 882).

Review of defendant's remaining contentions, including review in the interest of justice, is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 9-10).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RILEY
(Sep 30, 1999)