AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

NICHOLAS COLLINS, et al., appellants, v. DART TRANSIT COMPANY, et al., respondents.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that none of the parties resided in Bronx County at the time of the commencement of the action. Therefore, the plaintiffs' choice of venue was improper, and accordingly, they forfeited their right to select the venue of the action ( see, Cottone v. Real Estate Indus., 246 A.D.2d 572; Papadakis v. Command Bus Co., 91 A.D.2d 657). The defendants' motion to change the venue to Nassau County, in which both plaintiffs resided at the time of the commencement of the action, was properly granted ( see, Cottone v. Real Estate Indus., supra).

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, there is no evidence in the record that the parties agreed to fix Bronx County as the place of trial pursuant to CPLR 501.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

MANGANO, P.J., SANTUCCI, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COLLINS v. DART TRANSIT COMPANY
(Oct 12, 1999)