Defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence, statements and identification testimony was properly denied. The arresting officers possessed reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk defendant since his physical appearance sufficiently matched that of a description of a serial robber/burglar and defendant was spotted in the victimized neighborhood on a day of the week and at 6 A.M., the hour during which the prior crimes had occurred.
Defendant's application pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79) was properly denied. The record supports the court's conclusion that the reasons advanced by the prosecutor for exercising the peremptory challenges at issue were race-neutral and nonpretextual, and such findings are accorded great deference (People v. Wint, 237 A.D.2d 195, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1103).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.