AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. EFRAIN CORREA, appellant. (Ind. No. 567/96)

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that on a reverse-Batson application, the trial court applied the wrong standards in determining that the race-neutral excuses proffered by defense counsel were pretextual (see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79). That contention is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to object on those grounds at a time that the court could have remedied the perceived error (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, the record indicates that the court applied the appropriate legal standards (see, People v. Childress, 81 N.Y.2d 263).

BRACKEN, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CORREA
(Oct 18, 1999)