The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence from which the jury could have reasonably inferred defendant's active and intentional participation in the robbery and his display of what appeared to be a firearm, including evidence that defendant followed the victims while accompanied by the other perpetrators and then looked straight at the victims from a few feet away during the robbery while holding his hand inside his jacket, simulating a firearm (see, People v. Lopez, 73 N.Y.2d 214;People v. Baskerville, 60 N.Y.2d 374; People v. Spry, 232 A.D.2d 232,lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 930)
ELLERIN, P.J., WALLACH, LERNER, RUBIN, BUCKLEY, JJ.