Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANDREW GREENE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MARK SEIGLE, RONALD WRIGHT, JACQUELINE SUE TUROFF, B.J. BOND, LISA STRACHAN, DAVID STEELE, and ON-TARGET SOLUTIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Andrew Greene appeals final summary judgments entered in favor of all defendants. Defendants Mark Seigle and Ronald Wright cross-appeal the trial court's denial of their motions to dismiss. We affirm in all respects, except to reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of Wright.

Eight days after Wright filed his motion for summary judgment, the trial court granted it without a hearing or notice to Plaintiff. This violated Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c) and Plaintiff's due process rights and thus requires a reversal. See Mondestin v. Duval Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 500 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (holding that a party against whom a motion for summary judgment is filed is entitled to notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard). Accordingly, final summary judgment in favor of Wright is reversed and this case remanded for further proceedings against him. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GREENE v. SEIGLE
(Oct 27, 1999)