AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DORIS ELLERIN, respondent, v. BENTLEY'S, appellant, et al., defendant (and a third-party action).

DECISION ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Bentley's appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated November 16, 1998, which denied its motion to compel disclosure, and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 5, 1999, which denied its motion to reargue.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated February 5, 1999, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated November 16, 1998, is reversed, on the law, and the motion to compel disclosure is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

Since the plaintiff affirmatively placed her mental condition in controversy, the appellant was entitled to full disclosure regarding any psychiatric or psychological treatment she may have received prior to or subsequent to the date of the alleged negligence (see, Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287 ; St. Clare v. Cattani, 128 A.D.2d 766 ; Daniele v. Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Center, 74 A.D.2d 814 ).

S. MILLER, J.P., THOMPSON, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ELLERIN v. BENTLEY'S
(Nov 8, 1999)