AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

MATTER OF MATTHEW S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ONONDAGA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly determined after a hearing that exceptional circumstances required that respondent's probation be continued for an additional year (see, Family Ct Act § 353.2 Fam. Ct. Act.. [6]). The Onondaga County Probation Department presented proof of respondent's recalcitrance and need for continued counseling, and, in the absence of an order continuing probation, the court lacked authority to order continued counseling. Although an order of disposition may be modified pursuant to Family Court Act § 355.1 upon a showing of a substantial change of circumstances, any "new order of disposition under this section * * * expires * * * not later than the expiration date of the original order" (Family Ct Act § 355.1). We have examined respondent's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MATTHEW S
(Nov 12, 1999)