Plaintiff alleges a continuing trespass by the accumulation of debris on property subject to an easement for the City-owned Melrose Avenue Bridge. The first, second and fourth causes of action in the complaint are equitable in nature (abatement of nuisance and injunctive relief), whereas the third and fifth causes seek $75,000,000 in treble damages and $2 million plus $20,000 per day as compensation for reasonable "use and occupancy" of the property, respectively.
The requirement to file a formal notice of claim with the municipality does not apply to an action in equity to restrain a continuing act, and to demands for money damages which are merely incidental to such equitable claims (Dutcher v. Town of Shandaken, 97 A.D.2d 922, 923; Fontana v. Town of Hempstead, 18 A.D.2d 1084, affd 13 N.Y.2d 1134). The multimillion dollar damage claims here are more than simply incidental to the equitable relief sought by plaintiff. The fact that the major portion of the complaint seeks equitable relief does not, in this instance, preserve the damage claims made without formal notice. Accordingly, the motion court was correct insofar as it dismissed the third and fifth causes of action.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.