DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment ( see, Namisnak v. Martin, 244 A.D.2d 258; Perez v. Brux Cab Corp., 251 A.D.2d 157; Matt v. Tricil [N.Y.], 260 A.D.2d 811 [3d Dept., Apr., 15, 1999]). Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the evidence establishes that the plaintiff Namik Cenovski was negligent, as a matter of law, when he failed to yield the right-of-way to the defendant in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 Veh. Traf.(b) ( see, Nunziata v. Birchell, 238 A.D.2d 555; Anastasio v. Scheer, 239 A.D.2d 823; Dellavecchia v. Zorros, 231 A.D.2d 549). The defendant, who had the right-of-way, was entitled to anticipate that Cenovski would obey traffic laws which required him to yield ( see, Namisnak v. Martin, supra). Finally, the record does not support the plaintiffs' contention that a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the defendant was negligent in the operation of his truck ( see, Matt v. Tricil [N.Y.], Inc., supra; Namisnak v. Martin, supra; Perez v. Brux Cab Corp., supra).
S. MILLER, J.P., THOMPSON, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.