AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. DAVID JAMES BRADLEY, appellant. (Ind. No. 640/98)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered his plea of guilty ( see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Anderson, 260 A.D.2d 643 [2d Dept., Apr. 26, 1999]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05) or lacking in merit ( see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926; People v. McCray, 262 A.D.2d 585 [2d Dept., June 21, 1999]; see also, People v. Calloway, 176 Misc.2d 161).

BRACKEN, J.P., S. MILLER, THOMPSON, and FRIEDMANN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRADLEY
(Nov 30, 1999)