AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

BERALUS BRUNOT, plaintiff-respondent, v. JOE EISENBERGER CO., INC., appellant, et al., defendant; JARNOW CORPORATION, nonparty respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent.

To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)(1), the documentary evidence that forms the basis of the defense must be such that it resolves all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively disposes of the plaintiff's claim ( see, Scadura v. Robillard, 256 A.D.2d 567; Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87-88; Kalivia Food Corp. v. Hunts Point Coop. Mkt., 244 A.D.2d 460). Here, the documentary evidence submitted by the defendant in support of its motion failed to meet that burden.

BRACKEN, J.P., SANTUCCI, ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRUNOT v. JOE EISENBERGER CO., INC
(Nov 30, 1999)