AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

RANDALL ZIEGLER, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., defendants, CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., defendant third-party plaintiff; NEW YORK PAVING, INC., third-party defendant-respondent; BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY, third-party defendant-appellant (and a second third-party action).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court properly vacated the automatic dismissal and restored the action to the trial calendar. The plaintiffs demonstrated an absence of intent to abandon the case, reasonable excuse for the delay, a meritorious cause of action, and lack of prejudice to the defendants (see, CPLR 3404; Rifkin v. Herman, 262 A.D.2d 389 [2d Dept., June 7, 1999]; Etter v. County of Nassau, 261 A.D.2d 571 [2d Dept., May 24, 1999]).

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZIEGLER v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Dec 2, 1999)