Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CHRISTOPHER POLK, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief on the merits without a hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POLK v. STATE
(Dec 1, 1999)