AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of EARL BRISTOW, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Unit, Department of Correctional Ser

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from possessing weapons based upon proof indicating that a sharpened metal shank was found secreted in the back of petitioner's toilet. This determination was affirmed upon petitioner's administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the misbehavior report, combined with the reporting officer's testimony, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Although petitioner denied possessing the weapon, this merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v. Portuondo, 247 A.D.2d 810, 811). Additionally, we find that the hearing transcript was adequate for meaningful judicial review, and we reject petitioner's contention that he was denied the right to call witnesses who would provide relevant testimony (see, Matter of Nedrick v. Stinson, 263 A.D.2d 651, 652, 693 N.Y.S.2d 680, 681). The remaining arguments raised in petitioner's brief, to the extent that they are properly before us, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, MERCURE, CREW III and YESAWICH JR., JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BRISTOW v. SELSKY
(Dec 2, 1999)