ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in admitting a decision of the Social Security Administration as some evidence, but not prima facie evidence, of the facts contained therein ( see, Cramer v. Kuhns, 213 A.D.2d 131, 136; Kaiser v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 170 Misc.2d 321, 326; cf., CPLR 4520).
BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, FRIEDMANN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.