AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JACQUELYN RYAN, et al., appellants, v. MICHAEL B. KASSAY, et al., respondents.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Jacquelyn Ryan slipped and fell on an exterior step leading into the entrance of an apartment she and her husband, the plaintiff Paul Ryan, were leasing from the defendants, Michael B. Kassay and Mary Kassay. In a nonjury trial, the Supreme Court granted the defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law, made at the close of the plaintiffs' case.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and giving them the benefit of every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn therefrom (see, CPLR 4401;Feger v. Goldberg, 250 A.D.2d 727, 728 ), there was no rational process by which the Supreme Court, as the finder of fact, could have found that the defendants had either actual or constructive notice of the specific defect which caused Mrs. Ryan to fall (see,Stark v. Port Auth. of N.Y. N.J., 224 A.D.2d 681 ;Maldonado v. Matera, 237 A.D.2d 584 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law.

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, McGINITY, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RYAN v. KASSAY
(Dec 6, 1999)