Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. William Daniel KING, Appellant.

ORDER

After hearing oral argument and considering further the pleadings filed, it appears to the Court that the grant of review was improvident. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court of Appeals Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. KING
(Dec 8, 1999)