DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To vacate the order dismissing the complaint, the appellant had to proffer a reasonable excuse for the default and establish the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see, CPLR 5015[a][1]; Alliance Prop. Mgt. Dev. v. Andrews Ave. Equities, 70 N.Y.2d 831 ;McNeil v. Milstein, 240 A.D.2d 549 ; Martinez v. Otis El. Co., 213 A.D.2d 523 ). The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate the default (see, Alliance Prop. Mgt. Dev. v. Andrews Ave. Equities, supra; Barasch v. Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594 ). The record reveals an overall lack of diligence by the appellant in prosecuting his claim, a pattern of willful default, and neglect. No reasonable excuse was offered either for his failure to appear at the preliminary conference or for the lengthy delay in bringing the motion to vacate his default (see, Yepez v. Damico, 239 A.D.2d 412 ; Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568 ; Martinez v. Otis El. Co., supra; Gannon v. Johnson Scale Co., 189 A.D.2d 1052 ). Furthermore, the appellant failed to proffer sufficient evidence of the merit of his underlying claim.
MANGANO, P.J., RITTER, JOY, McGINITY, and SMITH, JJ., concur.