AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DESMOND ROBERTS, etc., et al., appellants, v. DONALD A. PIUS, respondent

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, notice of peeling paint is not notice of a hazardous lead condition (see, Andrade v. Wong, 251 A.D.2d 609 ; Busto v. Tamucci, 251 A.D.2d 441 ). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment (see, Brown v. Marathon Realty, 170 A.D.2d 426 ).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, FRIEDMANN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROBERTS v. PIUS
(Dec 13, 1999)