AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. DANIEL MALDONADO, appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER ARTUZ, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The issue raised in this proceeding could have been reviewed on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. In addition, the petitioner's CPL article 440 motion, based on the same ground as that raised in the petition, was previously denied, and leave to appeal therefrom was denied. Accordingly, habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy (see, People ex rel. Smith v. Hanslmaier, 237 A.D.2d 473 ; People ex rel. Benbow v. Scully, 189 A.D.2d 844 ; People ex rel. Jackson v. Scully, 183 A.D.2d 799 ; People ex rel. Heath v. Riley, 171 A.D.2d 768 ).

MANGANO, P.J., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE EX REL. MALDONADO v. ARTUZ
(Dec 20, 1999)