Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

HUTCHINSON, ANDERSON, COX and COONS, P. C., an Oregon Professional Corporation, fka Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Parrish and Coons, P. C., Respondent, v. RICHARD CRONK, Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on its action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendant. The trial court entered the judgment after it granted a directed verdict for plaintiff under ORCP 60 at the close of plaintiff's case. In his amended answer, defendant alleges several affirmative defenses, including real party in interest, waiver, laches, partial failure of consideration and complete failure of consideration. Those defenses could present factual issues, including whether the note was intended to secure payment for future legal services. See Thompson v. Dockstader, 131 Or. App. 254, 884 P.2d 586 (1994) (reasoning that whether a note is given as security for an antecedent debt is a question for the factfinder). As a result of the trial court's ruling, defendant was precluded from attempting to prove his affirmative defenses. ORCP 60 authorizes a motion for a directed verdict "at the close of all the evidence," or "at the close of the evidence offered by an opponent." Neither situation occurred here, and, consequently, the trial court erred. Because of our disposition, we do not reach defendant's other arguments.

ORCP 60 provides, in part:

"Any party may move for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence offered by an opponent or at the close of all the evidence."

We do not decide what evidence is admissible in support of defendant's defenses.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUTCHINSON, ANDERSON, COX AND COONS v. CRONK
(Dec 22, 1999)