DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the amended referee's report dated June 13, 1996, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new hearing and determination before a different referee.
Although the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in appointing a referee to hear and determine the issue in dispute pursuant to CPLR 4317(b), the referee's failure to address issues of credibility, as well as his determination that he was without authority to resolve factual disputes, requires vacatur of his amended report dated June 13, 1996. A referee appointed to hear and determine an issue has "all the powers of the court in performing a like function" (CPLR 4301; Muir v. Cuneo, 251 A.D.2d 638, 639 ). It is well established that where questions of fact are submitted to a referee, it is the function of the referee to determine the issues presented, as well as to resolve conflicting testimony and matters of credibility (see, Freedman v. Freedman, 211 A.D.2d 580 ; Kardanis v. Velis, 90 A.D.2d 727 ; Falcone v. Falcone, 24 A.D.2d 50, 54-55 ). Furthermore, in this case, the referee's failure to have the proceedings recorded renders meaningful appellate review of the proceedings impossible. Based upon the total record, the matter should be remitted to a different referee for a new hearing and determination.
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, McGINITY, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.